When two parents decide they cannot take care of their children together, chances are disputes will arise on who should be left with them. As such, the intervention of a court of law is important in solving cases alike. Among many pieces of evidence used to ascertain the same, psychological testing child custody is paramount. Some factors that encourage legal advisers to carry out emotional assessment are claims of juvenile abuse, drug addicted parents, uncouth parenting manners as well as the presence of cognitive illnesses in family history. Notably, there are countless factors to help identify mental capacity which sometimes may be impossible to perform. These among many other reasons contribute to some of the disadvantages of these approaches. Discussed below are a few of them.
The custody assessment process involves a series of actions. Firstly, psychologist interview persons in question to collect various facts regarding the relationship with kids. Notably, there are no universal guidelines directing how interviews are carried out. Similarly, questions vary from one specialist to another.
As a result, different specialists administer interviews in their own manner. For this reason, one cannot gauge the quality of an examination. Questions asked cannot be considered comprehensive or not which means they do not reflect the skill level of assessors. As a result, legal advisers may make wrong conclusions in the litigation process.
The next stage of evaluation is medical screening. Individuals are tested of different health conditions such as Rorschach inkblot just to mention a few. Like interviews, there are no scientifically defined tools to carry out these procedures. Therefore, each specialist may decide to use machines of their choice.
Consequently, experts define their own tests that may vary. Similarly, selected tools used to carry out screening differ with specialists. For this reason, it is impossible to ascertain correct results.
At the end of every test, specialists give a list of observations. Notably, behaviors vary with time hence a current examination result does not reflect how individuals will act tomorrow. For example, an alcoholic can decide to stop drinking some time in the future. Relying on such information to identify which parent is worth custody is therefore incorrect. As discussed earlier, tools used in the examination are different depending on a specialist. Likewise, formats vary with experts as well as questions asked. For this reason, observations are biased besides being erroneous. Use of such results thus might hinder sound ruling.
Another limitation appears in the evaluation of results. This is done by a person who could not have a psychosomatic background. Interpretation of similar care data will greatly differ between experts significantly. Similarly, when collecting data from particular families, professionals can decide to lean on one side.
The above points show clearly how the interview is performed, to what tests are done, observations made as well as interpretation of results is a biased process. This means that custody verdict which depends on that process may be incorrect too. Judges should supplement with other evidence.
The custody assessment process involves a series of actions. Firstly, psychologist interview persons in question to collect various facts regarding the relationship with kids. Notably, there are no universal guidelines directing how interviews are carried out. Similarly, questions vary from one specialist to another.
As a result, different specialists administer interviews in their own manner. For this reason, one cannot gauge the quality of an examination. Questions asked cannot be considered comprehensive or not which means they do not reflect the skill level of assessors. As a result, legal advisers may make wrong conclusions in the litigation process.
The next stage of evaluation is medical screening. Individuals are tested of different health conditions such as Rorschach inkblot just to mention a few. Like interviews, there are no scientifically defined tools to carry out these procedures. Therefore, each specialist may decide to use machines of their choice.
Consequently, experts define their own tests that may vary. Similarly, selected tools used to carry out screening differ with specialists. For this reason, it is impossible to ascertain correct results.
At the end of every test, specialists give a list of observations. Notably, behaviors vary with time hence a current examination result does not reflect how individuals will act tomorrow. For example, an alcoholic can decide to stop drinking some time in the future. Relying on such information to identify which parent is worth custody is therefore incorrect. As discussed earlier, tools used in the examination are different depending on a specialist. Likewise, formats vary with experts as well as questions asked. For this reason, observations are biased besides being erroneous. Use of such results thus might hinder sound ruling.
Another limitation appears in the evaluation of results. This is done by a person who could not have a psychosomatic background. Interpretation of similar care data will greatly differ between experts significantly. Similarly, when collecting data from particular families, professionals can decide to lean on one side.
The above points show clearly how the interview is performed, to what tests are done, observations made as well as interpretation of results is a biased process. This means that custody verdict which depends on that process may be incorrect too. Judges should supplement with other evidence.
About the Author:
Get a summary of the things to keep in mind when picking a psychologist and more information about a professional who offers psychological testing child custody purposes at http://www.drjamesrflens.com today.
Post A Comment:
0 comments:
Thanx for viewing us